Natural Family Planning Contradicts Scripture

Bread From Heaven: “Because the pleasure of the marital embrace was created by God for babies & bonding.”

Q. If the “marital embrace” is only for babies and bonding and and “Anytime the pleasure of the sexual act is obtained while actively, purposely or incidentally excluding either of these goods, it is a grave sin.” Is it a sin to have the “marital embrace” if there is no chance of conception such as after a woman has reached menopause?

A. No. That is natural and a part of God’s created order. It is still open to conception, although highly unlikely. But, don’t forget Sarah and Elizabeth both conceived in their old age by the will of God.

Q. But according to the statement, sexual activity after menopause would be “purposely or incidentally excluding either of these goods” since “incidentally” means not intentionally.

A. That is a very good point. Then, perhaps, incidentally is the wrong word but I used it with homosexual activity in mind. Because they are not engaging in the activity in order to avoid conception but only pursuing pleasure, the act prevents conception b/c it is unnatural. I am open to suggestions. And I will think about how to reword that. Thank you very much.

Q. So, that would cause all sexual intercourse between husband and a wife that does not work towards conception a sin.

A. No, that is not what the Church teaches at all. If it were, then infertile couples, women with necessary hysterectomies, women in menopause, men with no or low sperm count etc. would have to be celibate. This is not the case. The purpose of the marital embrace is for babies and bonding, both. Conception must not be removed from it for selfish reasons.

Q. Family planning or abstaining from sex during the fertile times which is written as ok, contradicts these scriptures because you are not to deny your spouse sex except when both have agreed for prayer.

1 Corinthians 7:3 The husband should not deprive his wife of sexual intimacy, which is her right as a married woman, nor should the wife deprive her husband. 4 The wife gives authority over her body to her husband, and the husband also gives authority over his body to his wife. 5 So do not deprive each other of sexual relations.

A. In our culture the right to sex is deemed to be absolute. Self-denial of sexual pleasure is thought to be ridiculous (except perhaps beastiality, incest, and pedophilia -the last taboos) At one time, not too long ago we had many more taboos -pre-marital sex, adultery, homosexuality, masturbation, oral sex, pornography, even contraception in addition to beastiality, incest, and pedophilia. How much longer before these also become normative in our culture?

What translation are you using? Most of the respected translations do not interpret the Greek as “not deprive”. The negative is nowhere in the sentence. Rather it is stated positively.

The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. (NASB)

The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. (NIV)

Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. (KJV)

Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband. (NKJV)

Husbands and wives should be fair with each other about having sex. (Contemporary Eng. Version)

To the wife, the husband the debt let him pay and likewise also the wife to the husband. (Literal Greek)

The Husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. (RSV)

should not deprive” should not be interpreted “as all demands for sex should be met lest one feel deprived

Your interpretation of I Cor. 7:3 is influenced by our culture. Because, the Protestant churches began to accept contraception in the early 1900′s they have lost the Christian perspective of sexual intimacy–Total Self-Giving. When a married couple indulges in the pleasure while practicing contraception they cannot be totally self-giving to their spouse. One or both are saying, with their bodies, while using a contraceptive, “I reject your fertility.” This subtle spiritual reality plays itself out in various subtle ways. For instance, the one with the strongest sex drive is freed to be more demanding of having sexual needs met and the other can begin to feel used. This is not conducive to a long and happy marriage.

For the difference between NFP and Contraception please click HERE

To read Humanae Vitae click HERE

About these ads

6 Responses to Natural Family Planning Contradicts Scripture

  1. nfpworks says:

    Well done with the answers.

  2. Samuel Skinner says:

    “in addition to beastiality, incest, and pedophilia. How much longer before these also become normative in our culture?”

    Slippery slope fallacy. The logical disconnect is that these activities involve sex with parties that cannot consent, sex that involves abuse of power and sex that involves abuse of power and lack of consent. Until forcing people to have sex with you becomes acceptable, none of those activities will be legalized.

    On a more practical note, the majority of the population commits the previous acts, but not these and thus they won’t ever vote to legalize them.

    “Then, perhaps, incidentally is the wrong word but I used it with homosexual activity in mind. Because they are not engaging in the activity in order to avoid conception but only pursuing pleasure, the act prevents conception b/c it is unnatural. I am open to suggestions. And I will think about how to reword that. Thank you very much.”

    What is so bad with things that our unnatural? If it wasn’t for screwing over the natural order I would be very, very dead. Or is it just important to butress homophobia?

  3. Dr. Eric says:

    Mr. Skinner,

    Who says that consent has anything to do with it? Who is watching to keep consent as the sole criterion and barrier for sex? Who says that animals, siblings, and teenagers cannot consent?

    Please answer these for me.

  4. Samuel Skinner says:

    “Who says that consent has anything to do with it? ”

    The United States Penal Code. Lack of consent is refered to as rape.

    “Who is watching to keep consent as the sole criterion and barrier for sex? ”

    Do you have another criteria that you aren’t sharing?

    “Who says that animals, siblings, and teenagers cannot consent?”

    Animals cannot communicate with humans- no consent.

    Silings can communicate, but insest also covers parent w/ children which is abuse of power an no consent.

    Teenagers can consent, which is why we don’t bar teens from having sex. We don’t let children have sex (consent as they are too young to understand)

    Teenagers aren’t allowed have sex with people outside a certain age range, but the range varies, mostly because they aren’t considered mature enough to be in relationships with adults but different countries consider different ages mature. The strict cutoff is ridiculous, but the nature of having written and clearly defined laws. laws

  5. Whomever might try and use 1 Corinthians 7:3 is ignorant of the methodology of NFP. NFP requires that both husband and wife work together to prayerfully discern whether abstinence is called for or not. Both spouses must be in agreement, or the method is being used in a contraceptive manner and is not in accordance with Church teaching.

  6. thefrenchchick says:

    The questioner also did not use the full text of verse 5. The full verse, 1 Cor 7:5, reads; “Do not refuse one another except perhaps by agreement, for a set time, to devote yourselves to prayer, and then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you through lack of self-control.

    So the bible does state that abstaining, but only for a set time, is acceptable. NFP is biblically based.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 87 other followers

%d bloggers like this: